Toth’s Record Reveals Pattern of Supporting Government Expansion Over Taxpayer Relief

Toth’s Record Reveals Pattern of Supporting Government Expansion Over Taxpayer Relief

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
DATE: November 3, 2025
EMAIL: pr***@*****************ss.com

Toth’s Record Reveals Pattern of Supporting Government Expansion Over Taxpayer Relief

[TX-02] – As more information about Rep. Steve Toth’s voting history emerges, Congressional District 2 voters have recently been reminded of Toth’s support for incorporating The Woodlands, a measure that directly leads to bigger government and higher taxes in our local communities.

In a now infamous video from 2021, Toth tried to mislead his constituents on the topic of incorporation, stating that it would lead to a “locally controlled government” instead of a “government of big business,” when incorporation would have created more bureaucracy, higher taxes, and less accountability, all paid for by local homeowners. Toth’s idea of “local control” simply means higher taxes and more government, not more freedom.

“For someone who constantly calls himself a staunch conservative, it’s shocking to see Toth unapologetically advocate for bigger government and higher costs for families,” said Bruce Tough, former Chairman of The Woodlands Township. “He’s completely out of touch with his constituents. Instead of listening to homeowners worried about higher taxes and more bureaucracy, he tried to convince them that bigger government was somehow a good thing. That’s not leadership, it’s pure arrogance.”

This pattern of behavior, however, has continued into the present, when during a recent Special Legislative Session Toth voted against legislation (SB 10) that would have directly combatted rising local property taxes.

The people of The Woodlands and across Congressional District 2 have repeatedly rejected higher taxes and bloated bureaucracy, yet Steve Toth continues to ignore their will. Toth’s record on incorporation and property taxes reflects a troubling pattern of supporting government expansion over taxpayer relief, a record voters won’t soon forget.

#####

Jim Jordan – Dan Crenshaw Fireside Chat

Jim Jordan – Dan Crenshaw Fireside Chat

You are cordially invited to join Congressman Dan Crenshaw for a Fireside Chat with Congressman Jim JordanThis event is free to attend and open to the public. Please feel free to share the invitation with your family, friends, and neighbors!

DATE:
Wednesday, November 12, 2025

TIME:
Doors Open: 5:00 PM CT
Fireside Chat: 5:30 PM – 6:30 PM CT

LOCATION:
Kevin Brady Community Center
2250 Buckthorne Pl
The Woodlands, TX 77380

RSVP is kindly requested. Please email ev****@*****************ss.com to let us know you’re coming.

We look forward to seeing you on November 12th!

In service,
Team Crenshaw
Steve Toth Votes Against Protecting Law Enforcement, Stuns Congressional District 2 Voters

Steve Toth Votes Against Protecting Law Enforcement, Stuns Congressional District 2 Voters

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
DATE: October 21, 2025
EMAIL: pr***@*****************ss.com

Steve Toth Votes Against Protecting Law Enforcement, Stuns Congressional District 2 Voters

[TX-02] – Congressional District 2 voters have recently come to realize Rep. Steve Toth voted against legislation designed to protect the lives of Texas law enforcement, setting off alarm bells all around the community.

The legislation, HB 2217 by Republican Rep. Trey Wharton, was filed during the latest legislative session and sought to establish “a grant program to equip local law enforcement vehicles with bullet-resistant windshields, side windows, and door panels” with the intention of enhancing officer safety.

HB 2217 enjoyed overwhelming Republican support and passed the House with only 6 nays. Toth was one of those nays. Regardless, HB 2217 later passed the Senate and was signed by Governor Abbott, becoming law.

“Rep. Steve Toth’s vote against protecting our law enforcement is a disgrace,” said Joe Gamaldi, National Vice-President of the Fraternal Order of Police. “HB 2217 is a major piece of legislation that greatly enhances the ability of police departments across Texas to protect their officers. Texas has led the nation in officers shot five years running and will likely again this year. Without bullet-resistant vehicles, law enforcement officers are put at immense risk and can easily be ambushed by criminals as we keep seeing time and again.”

Protecting our law enforcement isn’t optional, it’s a duty every legislature should uphold. Yet despite overwhelming support from Texas House Republicans to protect the men and women who wear the badge, Steve Toth voted against defending those on the front lines of our local communities. Once again, he’s shown just how incompetent he is as a legislator. Texas deserves leaders who will back the blue, not betray them when it matters most.

Houston, We Have a Problem, and His Name is Steve Toth

Houston, We Have a Problem, and His Name is Steve Toth

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

DATE: October 14, 2025

EMAIL: pr***@*****************ss.com

Houston, We Have a Problem, and His Name is Steve Toth

[TX-02] – Recently Congressional District 2 voters were alarmed by news that during the 89th Regular Legislative Session Rep. Steve Toth voted against a simple resolution urging Congress to move NASA’s headquarters to Houston.

The resolution, HCR 141 by Rep. Dennis Paul, “respectfully urge[d] the Congress of the United States to move NASA’s headquarters to Houston.” Because of its simple, common-sense nature, the resolution garnered wide bi-partisan support and was adopted by the House with 122 yeas to a mere 7 nays. The nays included Toth and five democrats.

Why Representative Toth would be against moving NASA to Houston is a mystery, as the benefits would be immense. It is widely believed that relocating NASA’s headquarters would not only cement Houston’s status as the nation’s hub for space exploration, but it would also bring thousands of high-paying jobs, attract billions in research funding, and expand opportunities for local universities and students pursuing careers in science and engineering.

The resolution itself spells out in simple terms why NASA should move to Houston, referencing its history as “Space City” and other facts that would make the move easy to facilitate and enhance the efficiency of NASA’s administration.

With all of this in mind, why would Steve Toth vote with democrats against a simple resolution designed to help Houston in so many ways, and why does he consistently pursue his own political ambitions before helping his constituents? These are confounding questions that shouldn’t have to be asked. Every possible answer to them, however, does mean one thing for certain: Steve Toth is not fit for elected office.

#####

Rep. Steve Toth Teams Up with Democrats to Kill Property Tax Relief

Rep. Steve Toth Teams Up with Democrats to Kill Property Tax Relief

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

DATE: September 29, 2025

EMAIL: pr***@*****************ss.com

[TX-02] – Earlier this month, State Representative Steve Toth stunned Congressional District 2 voters by voting against a bill in the Texas Legislature that would have directly combatted rising property taxes. 


The bill, SB 10, would have lowered the voter-approval threshold for property tax increases by cities and counties with more than 75,000 people. That means local governments would have had to seek voter approval sooner before raising property tax rates, putting stronger limits on how quickly property taxes can increase. Rep. Toth called this simple and effective measure “bull crap” on the floor of the Texas House and voted with nearly every Democrat to kill the proposed legislation. 


It is not clear why Rep. Toth voted against the measure, nor is it clear why Rep. Toth seemingly does not want his constituents to have a voice in the property tax debate. His vote against SB 10, however, does illustrate a trend in his voting record of either not understanding the issue he is voting on or voting a certain way for the sake of gaining attention rather than delivering results for the community he is supposed to represent.


Regardless, the residents of Congressional District 2 are left wondering why Rep. Toth would vote against a major Republican Party of Texas priority, turning his back on the party platform and leaving his constituents at the mercy of continuously rising property taxes.

###

This was the Charlie Kirk I knew

This was the Charlie Kirk I knew

Charlie Kirk and his family
People see Charlie Kirk as this vicious political figure, but I knew him.

He was unbelievably well read on Christian and conservative philosophy and he actually lived by those values in his personal life.

He had two beautiful children. I don’t see a divisive political figure I see a human being who didn’t deserve this at all.
This was the Charlie I knew. An intellectual. A fierce debater. Unafraid of any subject. Charlie was incredibly well-read and sophisticated. He explained Christian philosophy better than most theologians ever could. He knew the philosophical roots of conservatism with a deep understanding. 

He could explain the founding of Western Civilization and our country with incredible intellectual depth—but also in a way that anyone could understand. He knew that these principles are in danger of being lost and made it his mission to go on college campuses, outside our own echo chambers, and open himself up to debate. Unafraid. 
 
Years ago he was asked by someone why he did this. His response was perfect: ‘when we stop talking, we get civil war.’ 

Charlie never stopped talking, not even in his last minutes with us. 
 
It should never have cost him his life. 
 
I want this on the record for his children. As the father of a young daughter, I cannot fathom this heartbreak. We must all share the best of Charlie for the sake of his kids, and the true legacy of their father.
 
God Bless Charlie Kirk and his family.

In Service,

Dan Crenshaw
State Representative Steve Toth Voted Against Key Flood Control Bill — Now Wants to Represent Lake Houston in Congress

State Representative Steve Toth Voted Against Key Flood Control Bill — Now Wants to Represent Lake Houston in Congress

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

DATE: July 15, 2025

EMAIL: pr***@*****************ss.com

State Representative Steve Toth Voted Against Key Flood Control Bill — Now Wants to Represent Lake Houston in Congress

State Representative Steve Toth is encountering backlash after voting three times over the last three legislative sessions against a non-taxing dredging district that will combat flooding on the San Jacinto River in TX-02, an area he now seeks to represent in Congress.


“I have known Dan Crenshaw since he first ran for office and have immense respect for him,” said Bob Rehak, the host of Reduce Flooding. “He has worked hard to protect the people of this district by securing funding for numerous flood-mitigation projects including dredging. Steve Toth, on the other hand, voted against creating a Lake Houston Dredging District THREE times, dating back to 2021. He even voted against it when it wouldn’t have raised taxes. That tells me he’s out of touch with the needs of people in this congressional district. I plan on voting for Crenshaw.” 


Houston City Councilmember Fred Flickinger also expressed the vital nature of the legislation, stating: “House Bill 1532, authored by Representative Charles Cunningham, is arguably the most important piece of legislation for the Lake Houston area passed in the last several decades. This legislation creates a dredging district which allows us to address sediment in Lake Houston and the tributaries flowing into it proactively, rather than reactively after our area has flooded.  This legislation was introduced in the previous two sessions but failed.  Last year’s rain event was a perfect example of how dredging improves drainage.  The San Jacinto River crested two feet lower than predicted due to the dredging which had been completed over the last several years.  Congressman Crenshaw, Representative Huberty, Senator Creighton and Councilman Martin deserve special credit for securing the funding to complete these dredging efforts, some of which are ongoing today.” 


As the Houston area continues to grapple with the continued threat of flooding, many voters are left wondering why Rep. Toth repeatedly stood in the way of a bi-partisan, tax-neutral solution designed to protect their homes and businesses.

#####

Heartbreak and Heroism in Hill Country, Texas

Heartbreak and Heroism in Hill Country, Texas

If you live in Central Texas, flash flood warnings are part of life. Nowhere is that truer than the 150-mile stretch of land that sits on the banks of the Guadalupe River. Warnings happen often. Floods themselves are rare.

But on July 4 at 3 a.m., four months’ worth of rain fell within hours, rapidly saturating the dry Hill Country soil and swelling creeks into violent torrents.

The Guadalupe River that snakes through downtown Kerrville averages a depth of just 1.65 feet. But between 5:15 a.m. and 6:45 a.m. that day, it surged from two feet to 34 feet, becoming a literal wall of water that swept through Kerr County communities.

As of this morning, the flash floods have claimed more than 100 lives. Hundreds of families spent Independence Day searching through debris for missing loved ones. Among the dead is Jeff Wilson, a teacher at my hometown school district, Humble ISD. (His wife, Amber, and son, Shiloh, are still missing.)

The dead include 27 children from Camp Mystic, a storied girls’ Christian summer camp.

It’s impossible to look at the pictures of these girls, or to read of children like Brooke and Blair Harber. The sisters—11 and 13 years old—were found with their hands locked together.

I am the father of a young daughter. The pain is unimaginable.

Alongside the heartbreak was the kind of heroism that embodies the best of Texas.

At Camp La Junta, a boys’ summer camp in the small town of Hunt, college-age camp counselors leaped into action to wake the boys and rush them up the hillside to higher ground as flood waters rushed in. By that afternoon, Camp La Junta announced that every camper and staff member was safe and accounted for. Not a single life was lost at La Junta.

Camp Mystic, the historic girls’ camp downriver, bore the worst of the flood. As floodwaters engulfed the camp, its beloved owner and director, 73-year-old Dick Eastland, raced to the Bubble Inn, a cabin just 150 feet from the river, to save the girls in his care. Searchers later found Eastland downriver alongside three young campers. His grandson, George, said this about him: “If he wasn’t going to die of natural causes, this was the only other way, saving the girls that he so loved and cared for.”

Emma Foltz, a counselor at Camp Mystic, is a name every American should know. Foltz, a rising senior at Louisiana Tech, didn’t hesitate and guided 14 young campers from rising waters to high ground. We often think of our younger generations as fragile and afraid. How wrong that caricature can be. It was Americans in their late teens and early 20s who answered the call after 9/11, who stormed the beaches of Normandy, and who fought the British in 1775. Like them, Emma Foltz should be remembered for the same heroic public service.

Nearby, on the same stretch of river, in the Bumble Bee Hills neighborhood, Erin Burgess and her 19‑year‑old son were swept away until they found a tree to cling to for an hour before the water receded. When asked how she survived, Erin credited her teenage son’s strength and tenacity. “Thankfully, he’s over six feet tall. That’s the only thing that saved me, was hanging on to him.”

In the small town of Ingram, 27-year-old Julian Ryan fought to get his fiancée, their two young children, and his mother onto the roof. He punched out a window to give them an exit, a desperate action that severed the artery in his arm. Before the slashed artery rendered him unconscious, he refused to quit and made sure his whole family was safe on top of their roof. He looked at his loved ones, told them he loved them, and apologized that he “wasn’t going to make it.” His body was taken by the river and found hours later, after the water receded.

Our first responders also showed incredible heroism. Petty Officer Scott Ruskan, 26, of the U.S. Coast Guard, was on the first rescue mission of his career when he plunged into the floodwaters. Ruskan personally rescued 165 people stranded by the high water—an astonishing number of lives saved by one man. He was also the lone triage coordinator on the scene, tending to the injured in between helicopter operations to hoist survivors to safety. “I’m just doing a job,” Ruskan said when asked by the New York Post about his heroism. “This is what I signed up for. If anyone else had been on duty that day, they would’ve done the same thing.”

The Texas National Guard and local emergency responders continue their work as of this writing. Guard helicopter crews and high-water rescue teams have been saving families from rooftops and submerged cars without rest. In total, roughly 850 people have been rescued across Central Texas in this disaster—a testament to the tireless work of these men and women. These citizen-soldiers and first responders are showing us all what service truly means.

It is perhaps fitting that these stories of heroism occurred on Independence Day, of all days. It is what Independence Day is really about: heroism, self-sacrifice, courage, and love of community. These are the values we cherish as Americans and as Texans, and they were on full display in Central Texas this weekend.

One never knows if they will be a hero when the time comes. Only a test of tragedy will be the judge. Many think they will act with courage, but fail. Many think they will lack the courage, but instead become the hero we need. Neighbors saved neighbors. Ordinary people became heroes. That is the spirit of Texas. No flood can ever wash it away.

Continue to pray for the victims and their families. Pray for the good people of my beloved state.

This article by Congressman Dan Crenshaw was originally published in The Free Press on July 7, 2025

Why We Need the RIOT Act Now

Why We Need the RIOT Act Now

immigrant riots

WATCH DAN CRENSHAW ON DISINCENTIVIZING IMMIGRANT RIOTS

The war on drugs is now a counter-insurgency war. The Mexican cartels no longer resemble their origins as criminal drug traffickers, but that of a terrorist insurgency, and we need a strategy alongside the Mexican government to win this war. 

I call this strategy the North American Security Initiative, and the stakes could not be higher. Tens of thousands of American lives depend on our success, as does the future stability of North America. The United States simply cannot allow Mexico, our neighbor and largest trading partner, to devolve into a failed narco-state. 

Cartels have infiltrated every level of Mexican society, from the private sector to government to pop culture. They use terrorist tactics to suppress dissent and destabilize governments. They have effectively conquered regions of Mexico. They enact insidious propaganda and recruitment strategies, while their paramilitary arms rival the capabilities of the Mexican government. This insurgent-like behavior necessitates a counter-insurgency doctrine.

In 2000, we began “Plan Colombia,” providing Colombians with the resources—military equipment, training, and intelligence—to defeat the enemy within. The results? Massive improvements in Colombia over the past 20 years, going from a near-failed narco-state to the relatively safe and prosperous tourist destination it is today. I can speak from personal experience, having lived in Colombia from 1998-2002 during the height of the guerilla insurgency. But modern Mexico has a far deadlier cartel problem, and their historic reluctance to accept US assistance has allowed the problem to fester. 

So, what does a counter-insurgency doctrine in Mexico look like? Put simply, it requires the integration of military, intelligence, law enforcement, judicial, and diplomatic strategies.

The Mexicans are outgunned, for starters. We (Congress) need to authorize additional Presidential Drawdown Authority to properly arm the Mexican military—Black Hawk helicopters, close air support aircraft, and ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) capabilities, to name a few. We must develop a plan to train, at scale, Mexican special forces units and seek permissions from the Mexican government for our Special Forces to operate alongside these units, along with strong oversight to mitigate historic issues of corruption.

But this isn’t solely a military operation. There are critical judicial and law enforcement elements. Unfortunately, the Mexican judicial system is incompetent and often corrupt (though it has improved already under President Sheinbaum). This is where existing programs within Homeland, the DOJ, Treasury, and the FBI must be bolstered—we can offer training for judges, prosecutors, and police officers, as well as provide technical assistance for anti-corruption initiatives. And we must hit the cartels where it hurts the most: their pocketbook. 

Intelligence sharing is currently stronger than many realize and has led to some great success in recent months. Contrary to past Mexican administrations, the Sheinbaum national security team led by Secretary Omar Harfuch (himself a victim of an assassination attempt by the Jalisco cartel) has been relentless in their pursuit of cartel networks.

Fighting an insurgency requires network targeting, which means pursuing middle management as well as the “kingpins.” Sometimes you get more strategic benefit by arresting an irreplaceable money broker than a replaceable cartel boss. My amendment signed into law last year created long overdue changes to FISA collection capabilities, thus enabling new collection against the cartels that are just now coming to fruition. But more intelligence resources on the ground and in the air are needed. 

Fundamentally, counter-insurgency doctrine will mean the US assisting Mexican federal forces inside cartel-held territories with two basic missions: target the cartels and bolster the local and state police that are overwhelmed and outgunned. Are the local authorities often corrupt? Of course. But do they have choice? They live in the reality of “plata o plomo,” translated to “lead or money.” Fighting an insurgency means changing this dynamic. 

Whether we like it or not, we are already engaged in a counter-insurgency war against an increasingly dangerous enemy. And worse, we are currently operating without a coherent strategy.

But the good news is that we finally have an opportunity to change that. President Trump has made it clear this will be a priority. And for the first time in many years, the Mexican government is a willing partner. We must not let this opportunity go to waste.

This oped by Dan Crenshaw originally appeared in Human Events

“We’re in a Counter-Insurgency War Against the Mexican Cartels—It’s Time We Start Acting Like It”

“We’re in a Counter-Insurgency War Against the Mexican Cartels—It’s Time We Start Acting Like It”

The war on drugs is now a counter-insurgency war. The Mexican cartels no longer resemble their origins as criminal drug traffickers, but that of a terrorist insurgency, and we need a strategy alongside the Mexican government to win this war.

I call this strategy the North American Security Initiative, and the stakes could not be higher. Tens of thousands of American lives depend on our success, as does the future stability of North America. The United States simply cannot allow Mexico, our neighbor and largest trading partner, to devolve into a failed narco-state. 

Cartels have infiltrated every level of Mexican society, from the private sector to government to pop culture. They use terrorist tactics to suppress dissent and destabilize governments. They have effectively conquered regions of Mexico. They enact insidious propaganda and recruitment strategies, while their paramilitary arms rival the capabilities of the Mexican government. This insurgent-like behavior necessitates a counter-insurgency doctrine.

In 2000, we began “Plan Colombia,” providing Colombians with the resources—military equipment, training, and intelligence—to defeat the enemy within. The results? Massive improvements in Colombia over the past 20 years, going from a near-failed narco-state to the relatively safe and prosperous tourist destination it is today. I can speak from personal experience, having lived in Colombia from 1998-2002 during the height of the guerilla insurgency. But modern Mexico has a far deadlier cartel problem, and their historic reluctance to accept US assistance has allowed the problem to fester. 

So, what does a counter-insurgency doctrine in Mexico look like? Put simply, it requires the integration of military, intelligence, law enforcement, judicial, and diplomatic strategies.

The Mexicans are outgunned, for starters. We (Congress) need to authorize additional Presidential Drawdown Authority to properly arm the Mexican military—Black Hawk helicopters, close air support aircraft, and ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) capabilities, to name a few. We must develop a plan to train, at scale, Mexican special forces units and seek permissions from the Mexican government for our Special Forces to operate alongside these units, along with strong oversight to mitigate historic issues of corruption.

But this isn’t solely a military operation. There are critical judicial and law enforcement elements. Unfortunately, the Mexican judicial system is incompetent and often corrupt (though it has improved already under President Sheinbaum). This is where existing programs within Homeland, the DOJ, Treasury, and the FBI must be bolstered—we can offer training for judges, prosecutors, and police officers, as well as provide technical assistance for anti-corruption initiatives. And we must hit the cartels where it hurts the most: their pocketbook. 

Intelligence sharing is currently stronger than many realize and has led to some great success in recent months. Contrary to past Mexican administrations, the Sheinbaum national security team led by Secretary Omar Harfuch (himself a victim of an assassination attempt by the Jalisco cartel) has been relentless in their pursuit of cartel networks.

Fighting an insurgency requires network targeting, which means pursuing middle management as well as the “kingpins.” Sometimes you get more strategic benefit by arresting an irreplaceable money broker than a replaceable cartel boss. My amendment signed into law last year created long overdue changes to FISA collection capabilities, thus enabling new collection against the cartels that are just now coming to fruition. But more intelligence resources on the ground and in the air are needed. 

Fundamentally, counter-insurgency doctrine will mean the US assisting Mexican federal forces inside cartel-held territories with two basic missions: target the cartels and bolster the local and state police that are overwhelmed and outgunned. Are the local authorities often corrupt? Of course. But do they have choice? They live in the reality of “plata o plomo,” translated to “lead or money.” Fighting an insurgency means changing this dynamic. 

Whether we like it or not, we are already engaged in a counter-insurgency war against an increasingly dangerous enemy. And worse, we are currently operating without a coherent strategy.

But the good news is that we finally have an opportunity to change that. President Trump has made it clear this will be a priority. And for the first time in many years, the Mexican government is a willing partner. We must not let this opportunity go to waste.

This op ed was originally published in Human Events Daily on June 10, 2025.