Bernie’s Lies About President Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill

Bernie’s Lies About President Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill

Bernie's lies about President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill
This tweet basically sums up Bernie’s lies, and the left’s argument, against anything Trump does: “PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DIE!!”

This is the case for everything. President Trump wants to cut taxes? A death sentence according to the left! President Trump thinks we should use reliable fossil fuels instead of unreliable solar and wind? He’s killing everyone on the planet, Greta Thunberg screams! President Trump believes we should secure the border? Children will die!

So, it’s no surprise that we’re seeing the same hyperbolic rhetoric about President Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. But Bernie’s claim that the bill will kill 51,000 people every year is just absurd, dangerous, and flat out wrong. Here are the facts. 

First off, Bernie asked Yale and Penn to produce a number he could weaponize, and they obliged. I read their letter. Here’s why it’s built on bad assumptions and politics, not facts.

They claim 11,300 people will die from losing Medicaid or ACA coverage. What do they leave out? Most of those losing coverage are: 1.4 million Illegal immigrants, 2.8 million duplicate or enrollees who make too much money to be on these programs in the first place, 4.8 million able-bodied adults who don’t need to be on government-subsidized healthcare. 

We’re restoring the program to serve those who truly need it. That’s fair, and it pus Medicaid on a better financial footing for the people it was intended to serve. 

They say 18,200 seniors will die from losing automatic access to drug subsidies. That’s not how this works. These seniors can still apply and get help. The letter assumes no one re-enrolls. This is just updating eligibility, like every program does. They say 13,300 will die if we repeal a nursing home staffing mandate. But that mandate isn’t funded, and many nursing homes, especially in rural areas, can’t meet it. Keeping it would force closures. Repealing it actually keeps care available.

Now here’s what the bill really does: It protects Medicaid for seniors, kids, people with disabilities, and pregnant women. It cuts out waste, fraud, and ineligible use. And yes — it brings back work requirements. The work requirement provision simply says if you’re healthy, not in school, and have no kids, you have to work, volunteer, or train 20 hours a week to keep benefits. According to polling, 81% of Americans think that sounds fair.

So, no Bernie, we are not killing people. We are preserving government programs for people who actually need them and Americans agree with our efforts. Fear mongering is not going to work against common sense.

One Big Beautiful Bill Heads to the Senate

One Big Beautiful Bill Heads to the Senate

One Big Beautiful Bill Heads to the Senate
CLICK HERE TO WATCH DAN CRENSHAW ON THE ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL
This week, after marathon committee meetings, midnight debates on the House floor, and what seemed like endless delay tactics from Democrats, President Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill passed the House. 

What does this mean for average American families? Fundamentally it means their taxes won’t drastically increase in December, which is what will happen automatically unless we take action to extend the 2017 Trump tax cuts. 

The bill included much more than that, though, and represents the lion’s share of President Trump’s agenda that he promised on the campaign trail in 2024. We also reined in major spending programs by well over a trillion dollars. We reformed government programs like Medicaid to ensure these programs are solvent for the people who actually need them.

The reality of legislating is crafting the most conservative bill that can actually get the votes and become law. We accomplished that with this bill. It is a huge win for House Republicans, President Trump, and most importantly the American people. The Senate should act immediately to get this Big Beautiful Bill to President Trump’s desk so he can sign it into law and start delivering these wins for the country. 

Fighting Back Against Activist Judges

Fighting Back Against Activist Judges

This bill will end the power of activist judges - for good

CLICK HERE TO WATCH

Right now, activist judges can shut down an entire national policy—immigration enforcement, border security, you name it. They’re using that power to block deportations and stall President Trump’s agenda before it even gets off the ground.

I don’t believe the judicial check was ever meant to be used so prolifically. It’s a necessary check, undoubtedly. There will often be disagreement between the Executive (charged to “execute” the law), and the courts. This is usually the fault of Congress for writing laws that are vague in nature. But that “check” cannot be a single unelected judge, effectively empowered with the same “execution” authority as the President. We must properly balance this important mechanism of checks and balances. 

That’s why I support the No Rogue Rulings Act. This bill reins in activist judges by stopping them from issuing broad, nationwide rulings in cases that should only apply to the people directly involved. It restores balance between the courts, Congress, and the executive branch—just like the Constitution intends.

Protecting Military Readiness From Radical Transgender Ideology

Protecting Military Readiness From Radical Transgender Ideology

Protecting Military Readiness From Radical Transgender Ideology

CLICK HERE OR ON THE IMAGE ABOVE TO WATCH

In another case of common sense vs. crazy, President Trump issued another executive order related to combating the mission creep of transgender ideology – this one related to its impact on our military. 

I have stated for years that military readiness cannot and should not be undermined by those who choose to undergo gender reassignment surgery. CNN tried to hit me with a “gotcha!” clip in an interview this week, attempting to show that I changed my position on this issue by selectively editing an interview from 2021. You can watch the full interview above to see what I’m talking about. 

Here are the facts on Trump’s executive order and this issue on transgenders in the military broadly: undergoing a gender transition fundamentally impacts a person’s ability to meet military readiness standards. These procedures often require extended recovery times, ongoing medical treatments, and create significant physical and mental challenges.

I am happy to be the face of common sense in this debate. I know what our warfighters need in an increasingly dangerous world to be a lethal fighting force. That does not include forcing a radical, DEI-focused ideology into our military.

Protecting Our Children From Dangerous, Irreversible Gender Transition Procedures

Protecting Our Children From Dangerous, Irreversible Gender Transition Procedures

Protecting Our Children From Dangerous, Irreversible Gender Transition Procedures

CLICK HERE TO READ PRESIDENT TRUMP’S EXECUTIVE ORDER

President Trump signed an executive order this week that states unequivocally what has been clear to the vast majority of Americans for a while: taxpayer dollars, and the U.S. government as whole, should not support irreversible and dangerous gender transition procedures on children. 

It is hard to overstate the importance of this executive action from President Trump. The Biden Administration was not only funding, but actively encouraging, these procedures on children. Now, we have an administration that is “following the science,” as the left likes to say, and halting any support for what amounts to the mutilation of children. 

Even with this executive order, Congress still has an important role to play. 

I’ve been pushing legislation in Congress to block taxpayer funding for hospitals that transition minors. I’m pleased to see this first step that seeks to block federal programs from covering these procedures for minors and prevent grant funding for institutions that promote this. We still need to pass legislation to defund this permanently, and I’m ready to work with President Trump to get that done in our budget reconciliation package.

My position, and President Trump’s position, is squarely in line with the American public. 70 percent of Americans oppose using puberty blockers on minors according to polling, and that doesn’t even include harmful procedures like double mastectomies on children. 

The left will continue to label efforts like President Trump’s executive order and my legislation in Congress as “bigoted, anti-trans” policy. But, in reality, our position is a commonsense view shared by the American people: we should not treat our children like lab rats in an ideological experiment that has irreversible consequences.

Watch Kamala End Her Presidential Prospects

Watch Kamala End Her Presidential Prospects

Watch kamala harris end her presidential prospects

WATCH KAMALA HARRIS END HER PRESIDENTIAL PROSPECTS

Welp, Kamala Harris basically obliterated the central thesis behind her candidacy for president this week. 

Kamala Harris’s entire campaign is premised around her being a “change” candidate. Literally, the motto for her presidential campaign is: “New Way Forward.”

So, naturally, when Kamala Harris was asked on The View what she would do differently than Joe Biden as president, her answer was…. “NOT A THING.”

It is almost hard to believe until you watch her say it, so please watch the clip above to see for yourself. 

As a reminder, Kamala Harris has sat by while Joe Biden:

  • Unleashed inflation, raising costs for groceries, gas, rent, and everything else while wages have barely kept pace with rising prices.
  • Opened our borders and mass paroled criminal illegals into our country, which led to the senseless deaths of innocent American women and girls.
  • Fled Afghanistan in such horrific fashion that 13 Americans died, thousands of our allies were abandoned, billions in weapons were handed over to terrorists, and America’s credibility on the world stage was destroyed leading to unprecedented aggression from our adversaries. 

Kamala wouldn’t change anything? “Not a thing” comes to mind? 

This is what you’re going to get with a President Kamala Harris, the same failed policies packaged in a far-left, San Francisco radical. 

Vote for Donald Trump.

The Poster Child For Trump Derangement Syndrome

The Poster Child For Trump Derangement Syndrome

The poster child for Trump Derangement Syndrome

CLICK HERE OR ON THE IMAGE ABOVE TO WATCH THE FULL DEBATE

Debating liberals is one thing I enjoy in politics probably more than anything else. I like these debates because, usually, they are substantive discussions over which policies** are better suited to handle issues we all agree need to be addressed (immigration, foreign policy, taxation, etc.). 

Debating someone who calls themselves a “conservative” while also endorsing Kamala Harris over Donald Trump was a new one for me. But I decided to do it anyways because I thought it was important to expose just how shallow the arguments against Donald Trump really are. 

You can watch the debate above for yourself. The guy I was debating is the poster child for Trump Derangement Syndrome – none of his arguments were based on policy; all of his arguments were emotionally centered attacks on Donald Trump’s character. 

It’s a long one, but it is worth your time if you want a few tactics for debating people like this you might encounter.